Citations

"Future of Education Technology." Emerging Education Technologies RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Oct. 2014. <http://www.emergingedtech.com/category/future-of-education-technology/>.

Britland, Matt. "What Is the Future of Technology in Education?" The Guardian. N.p., 19 June 2013. Web. 18 Oct. 2014. <http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fteacher-network%2Fteacher-blog%2F2013%2Fjun%2F19%2Ftechnology-future-education-cloud-social-learning>.

"Envisioning the Future of Education." Envisioning. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Oct. 2014. <http://www.envisioning.io/education/>.

"The Future of Education Technology." Education Blog for Teachers Parents Students Educational App Store. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Oct. 2014. <http://www.educationalappstore.com/blog/the-future-of-education-technology/>.

Grantham, Nick. "Five Future Technologies That Will Shape Our Classrooms." Edutopia. N.p., 10 Apr. 2012. Web. 16 Oct. 2014. <http://www.edutopia.org/blog/five-future-education-technologies-nick-grantham>.

Rubric

Beginning
1
Developing
2
Accomplished
3
Exemplary
4
Score
Attractiveness
The poster has no organization or clear theme.
The poster is acceptably attractive though it maybe a bit messy.
The poster is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.
The poster is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.

Grammar
Several spelling or grammar errors.
3-4 spelling or grammar errors.
1-2 few spelling or grammar errors.
No spelling or grammar errors.

Content
Ideas /concepts presented. Unable to follow content.
Ideas /concepts not very well presented. Content hard to follow.
Ideas/concepts mostly presented. Poster is concise. Content was somewhat easy to follow.
Ideas/concepts thoroughly presented. Very brief and concise. Content easy to follow.

Digital Citizenship
No citations present for sources.
Some citations present, sources incorrectly cited.
Most citations present and sources correctly cited.
All citations present and correctly cited throughout project.